Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/906
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKretchyI, James-Paul-
dc.contributor.authorDzodzomenyo, Mawuli-
dc.contributor.authorAyi, Irene-
dc.contributor.authorDwomoh, Duah-
dc.contributor.authorAgyabeng, Kofi-
dc.contributor.authorKonradsen, Flemming-
dc.contributor.authorDalsgaard, Anders-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-09T11:45:28Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-09T11:45:28Z-
dc.date.issued2020-10-02-
dc.identifier.citationKretchy, J. P., Dzodzomenyo, M., Ayi, I., Dwomoh, D., Agyabeng, K., Konradsen, F., & Dalsgaard, A. (2020). Risk of faecal pollution among waste handlers in a resource-deprived coastal peri-urban settlement in Southern Ghana. Plos one, 15(10), e0239587.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239587-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/906-
dc.description.abstractResource-deprived coastal peri-urban settlements in Southern Ghana are characterized by indiscriminate solid waste disposal and open defecation practices. Persons engaged in waste handling in such communities perform their activities with little or no personal protec tive equipment. They are thus confronted with the risk of faecal pollution of the hands and other bodily parts. A mixed method approach was used to investigate 280 waste handlers performing different activities to estimate recent faecal pollution of their hands and to observe the utilization of personal protective equipment and sanitation/hygiene facilities during work. The log concentration of E. coli on hands of waste handlers after work (8.60 ± 4.20 CFU/hand, mean ± standard deviation) was significantly higher compared with the E. coli log concentration before work (2.95 ± 1.89 CFU/hand, mean ± standard deviation) (p<0.001). The odds of faecal pollution was significantly higher (aOR 4.2; 95% CI: 1.9–9.1) for workers aged 35 years and above compared with those less than 35 years; and for work ers at public toilet facilities (aOR 3.0; 95% CI: 1.0–8.4) compared with those who worked for private waste handling companies. Female workers were, however, 60% less likely (aOR 0.4; 95% CI: 0.2–0.8) to experience faecal pollution of their hands compared with males. The workers had limited access to water and sanitation and hygiene facilities, and about one-fifth (n = 59; 21.1%) did not use personal protective equipment during work. Waste han dlers should be provided and instructed in proper use of personal protective equipment, have access to sanitation facilities and adopt improved hygiene behaviour to avoid the risk of faecal pollution and associated disease risk.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis paper is part two of a three parts paper supported by the Sustainable Sanitation (SUSA) Ghana project under its Work Package 4, with funding from the Danish International Development Agency (DANIDA-10-050KU) and jointly implemented by the University of Ghana School of Public Health, Legon, Ghana; Dodowa Health Research Centre, Ghana, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana and the University of Copenhagen, Denmark. The Agency, however, played no role in the conduct of the research and the views expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of DANIDA.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPlos oneen_US
dc.subjectPollutionen_US
dc.subjectGhanaen_US
dc.titleRisk of faecal pollution among waste handlers in a resource-deprived coastal peri-urban settlement in Southern Ghanaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:ARTICLES



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.