Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/544
Title: Comparative quality evaluation of selected brands of cefuroxime axetil tablets marketed in the greater accra region of Ghana
Authors: Osei-Asare, Christina
Oppong, Esther Eshun
Owusu, Frederick William Akuffo
Apenteng, John Antwi
Alatu, Yvonne Ochesinda
Sarpong, Robert
Keywords: Cefuroxime axetil tablets
Ghana
Comparative quality evaluation
Selected brands
Issue Date: 8-Apr-2021
Publisher: The Scientific World Journal
Citation: Osei-Asare, C., Oppong, E. E., Owusu, F. W. A., Apenteng, J. A., Alatu, Y. O., & Sarpong, R. (2021). Comparative quality evaluation of selected brands of cefuroxime axetil tablets marketed in the greater accra region of Ghana. The Scientific World Journal, 2021, 1-6.
Abstract: The ever-growing commercialization of poor-quality and substandard medicines, especially anti-infectives characterized by inadequate postmarket surveillance by stakeholders remains a major global health challenge, particularly in developing countries, where antibiotic drug resistance and its repercussions on human health remain dominant. This research sought to evaluate the pharmaceutical quality of six randomly selected brands of cefuroxime axetil tablets (250 mg) marketed in the Greater Accra region of Ghana. *e selected brands were coded and subjected to both compendial and noncompendial tests. Statistical analysis and model-independent parameter (similarity factor, f2) were employed in analyzing the dissolution profiles of all the brands. All brands including the reference brand conformed to the pharmacopeial specifications for both compendial and noncompendial tests, indicating that they were of good quality. However, there were significant variations (p < 0.05) in the disintegration time amongst the various brands. All the brands had f 2 values > 50 indicating similarity of their drug release profiles with the innovator. Hence, all the sampled cefuroxime axetil brands can be considered as pharmaceutical equivalents to the innovator drug. These brands can, therefore, be used as a substitute for the innovator drug by physicians to patients in cases of unaffordability or unavailability of the innovator brand.
URI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6659995
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/544
Appears in Collections:ARTICLES



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.