Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/509
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDashwood, Hevina S.-
dc.contributor.authorIdemudia, Uwafiokun-
dc.contributor.authorPuplampu, Bill Buenar-
dc.contributor.authorWebb, Kernaghan-
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-10T12:15:48Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-10T12:15:48Z-
dc.date.issued2022-04-05-
dc.identifier.citationDashwood, H. S., Idemudia, U., Puplampu, B. B., & Webb, K. (2022). Ghana's adoption of the extractive industries transparency initiative (EITI): The path from data disclosure to community accountability. The Extractive Industries and Society, 10, 101068.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2214-790X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/509-
dc.description.abstractThe Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) is a global standard that aims to promote greater accountability and transparency in the extractive sector. Drawing on research carried out in Ghana to assess the impact of the Ghana EITI (GHEITI) at the community level, this paper asks: Is there variation between mining communities in the level of awareness of GHEITI and royalty disbursements to rural districts, and if so, what might this mean for improving accountability to mining communities? Unearthing variation is important, as it can help to identify roadblocks to improved accountability to mining communities which can inform appropriate policy interventions. Recognizing the heterogeneity of communities, the exploratory research considers the potential role of accountability mechanisms, such as community outreach activities of GHEITI, and advocacy on the part of civil society organisations (CSOs) in enhancing awareness. The research builds on studies that examine local dynamics that tend to be lost in national-level analyses.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) of Canada. Research was conducted in accordance with Brock University’s research ethics protocols, including confidentiality and anonymity of interviewees and focus group mem bers. Ethics clearance was provided for the research by Brock’s Research Ethics Board (REB): File: 17-175-DASHWOOD.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThe Extractive Industries and Societyen_US
dc.subjectTransparencyen_US
dc.subjectExtractive sectoren_US
dc.subjectMineral royalties disclosureen_US
dc.subjectMining communitiesen_US
dc.subjectAccountabilityen_US
dc.titleGhana's adoption of the extractive industries transparency initiative (EITI)en_US
dc.title.alternativeThe path from data disclosure to community accountability.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:ARTICLES



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.